Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index — Q3-2026
The PYC Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index ranks 35 gloucester architects on how well they perform online — website speed, technical SEO, local presence, search visibility, AI search presence and content & trust — each scored 0–100 to a single Digital Visibility Score. Measured 1 September 2026 to the published methodology.
As of Q3-2026, 6% of the 32 gloucester architects measured on Speed & Core Web Vitals score below 50 on mobile (PYC Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index, measured 1 September 2026).
Who owns the first page
Section titled “Who owns the first page”this index (39) directories, national chains and firms not indexed (81)
Ranking well but not currently indexed:
- checkatrade.com — 7 top-10 slots, best #1
- aurahomes.co.uk — 7 top-10 slots, best #3
- grayarchitecture.co.uk — 5 top-10 slots, best #4
- apexarchitectureltd.com — 3 top-10 slots, best #2
- ce-architects.co.uk — 3 top-10 slots, best #4
67.5% of the first page belongs to businesses outside this index — directories, national chains and local firms not tracked here. These firms are not mainly competing with each other.
The league table
Section titled “The league table”Which keywords are contested, and which are open?
Section titled “Which keywords are contested, and which are open?”| architects | architect | architectural services | house extension architect | planning application archit… | listed building architect | residential architects | commercial architects | self build architect | loft conversion architect | barn conversion architect | conservation architect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK Architectural Gloucestershire | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Quattro Design Architects Ltd | 2 | 5 | 28 | 43 | 5 | 13 | ||||||
| PSK Architect | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||||
| RE-Design Architects | 31 | 23 | 12 | 20 | 10 | 60 | 35 | 28 | 28 | 32 | ||
| CMS Group | 27 | 65 | 14 | 55 | ||||||||
| Roberts Limbrick Ltd | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Pier Architects Ltd. | 24 | 25 | 20 | 63 | 75 | 37 | 5 | 69 | ||||
| The Development Studio (TDS) | 10 | 9 | 9 | 31 | 26 | 2 | 60 | |||||
| A1 Architecture Ltd | 26 | 18 | 34 | 18 | 11 | 66 | 23 | 24 | 37 | 2 | 63 | 61 |
| Homeplan Drafting Services | 35 | 30 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 48 | 72 | |||
| SMAC Architecture | 51 | 40 | 58 | 68 | 39 | 77 | ||||||
| Aston Architectural Design Ltd. | 49 | 32 | 66 | 83 | 61 | 81 | ||||||
| Francesco Pierazzi Architects | ||||||||||||
| GSSArchitecture | ||||||||||||
| Cotswold Architecture + Design | Contemporary Architecture & Extension Specialists | ||||||||||||
| Joanna James Ltd | ||||||||||||
| Cheltenham CAD Services Ltd T/A Hoch Bau Architecture + Engineering | ||||||||||||
| Port Architects Limited | 52 | 49 | ||||||||||
| Stantec | ||||||||||||
| Extension Architecture Gloucester - Extension Plans & Design | ||||||||||||
| Forde Architecture | ||||||||||||
| Border Consultancy Chartered Surveyors Ltd | ||||||||||||
| Ceri ap Dafydd Architect | ||||||||||||
| Manifest Design Workshop Ltd | ||||||||||||
| Clancy Design Services | ||||||||||||
| Potter Church & Holmes | ||||||||||||
| Peter A Marshall Architect Limited | 67 | |||||||||||
| D 2 B Designs | ||||||||||||
| Morgan Barnfield Construction | ||||||||||||
| Richard Falconer Architect | ||||||||||||
| Conault Design | ||||||||||||
| RM Architectural Services | ||||||||||||
| blueprint | ||||||||||||
| Evolve Building Solutions Ltd | ||||||||||||
| James Taylor Visualisations |
1–3 4–10 11–20 21+ absent
Where each firm is visible
Section titled “Where each firm is visible”| Visible in | Firms | Which |
|---|---|---|
| All three channels | 2 | Quattro Design Architects Ltd, Roberts Limbrick Ltd |
| Organic + local pack | 1 | Homeplan Drafting Services |
| Organic + AI | 2 | CK Architectural Gloucestershire, PSK Architect |
| Local pack + AI | 0 | — |
| Organic only | 4 | RE-Design Architects, Pier Architects Ltd., The Development Studio (TDS), A1 Architecture Ltd |
| Local pack only | 3 | SMAC Architecture, Aston Architectural Design Ltd., Extension Architecture Gloucester - Extension Plans & Design |
| AI only | 3 | CMS Group, Manifest Design Workshop Ltd, Potter Church & Holmes |
| None of the three | 20 | Francesco Pierazzi Architects, GSSArchitecture, Cotswold Architecture + Design | Contemporary Architecture & Extension Specialists, Joanna James Ltd, Cheltenham CAD Services Ltd T/A Hoch Bau Architecture + Engineering, Port Architects Limited, Stantec, Forde Architecture, Border Consultancy Chartered Surveyors Ltd, Ceri ap Dafydd Architect, Clancy Design Services, Peter A Marshall Architect Limited, D 2 B Designs, Morgan Barnfield Construction, Richard Falconer Architect, Conault Design, RM Architectural Services, blueprint, Evolve Building Solutions Ltd, James Taylor Visualisations |
2 of 35 firms are visible in all three channels. 20 appear in none of them.
Search visibility against AI presence
Section titled “Search visibility against AI presence”horizontal: search visibility → vertical: AI presence ↑
Potter Church & Holmes is the widest split: AI engines name it far more readily than search surfaces it (AI 80, visibility 0) — brand without search. Those are different problems behind a similar overall score.
Closest to the first page
Section titled “Closest to the first page”| A1 Architecture Ltd | A1 Architecture Ltd — planning application architect Gloucester | #11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE-Design Architects | RE-Design Architects — architectural services Gloucester | #12 | |
| Quattro Design Architects Ltd | Quattro Design Architects Ltd — commercial architects Gloucester | #13 | |
| CMS Group | CMS Group — commercial architects Gloucester | #14 | |
| A1 Architecture Ltd | A1 Architecture Ltd — architect Gloucester | #18 | |
| A1 Architecture Ltd | A1 Architecture Ltd — house extension architect Gloucester | #18 | |
| RE-Design Architects | RE-Design Architects — house extension architect Gloucester | #20 | |
| Pier Architects Ltd. | Pier Architects Ltd. — architectural services Gloucester | #20 |
8 winnable positions across 5 firms sit between #11 and #20 — one page off, and closer than any keyword the index does not already measure.
Reputation: reviews against rating
Section titled “Reputation: reviews against rating”horizontal: reviews (log) → vertical: rating ↑
Review volume spans 1 to 29 and ratings 3.7 to 5, yet the Local pillar separates these firms by only 17 points — the raw figures discriminate where the score does not. Most reviews: SMAC Architecture (29). Highest rating: 10 firms tied at 5.
What the keyword basket is asking
Section titled “What the keyword basket is asking”| commercial | 11 of 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| informational | 1 of 12 |
Local pack coverage across the city
Section titled “Local pack coverage across the city”| 1NWnorth-west, 51.918, -2.325 — Aston Architectural Design Ltd. | 3Nnorth, 51.918, -2.238 — Aston Architectural Design Ltd., SMAC Architecture, PSK Architect | 3NEnorth-east, 51.918, -2.151 — PSK Architect, RE-Design Architects, Cotswold Architecture + Design | Contemporary Architecture & Extension Specialists |
| 2Wwest, 51.864, -2.325 — Aston Architectural Design Ltd., Pier Architects Ltd. | 3·centre, 51.864, -2.238 — SMAC Architecture, Pier Architects Ltd., Quattro Design Architects Ltd | 3Eeast, 51.864, -2.151 — PSK Architect, Cotswold Architecture + Design | Contemporary Architecture & Extension Specialists, RE-Design Architects |
| 2SWsouth-west, 51.810, -2.325 — Aston Architectural Design Ltd., Pier Architects Ltd. | 2Ssouth, 51.810, -2.238 — Pier Architects Ltd., SMAC Architecture | 1SEsouth-east, 51.810, -2.151 — Cotswold Architecture + Design | Contemporary Architecture & Extension Specialists |
none 1 firm 2 3 of the pack
What the register says this cohort is
Section titled “What the register says this cohort is”| SIC | Registered activity | Firms |
|---|---|---|
| 71111 | Architectural activities | 8 |
| 74100 | Not labelled here | 1 |
| 63990 | Not labelled here | 1 |
| 41100 | Development of building projects | 1 |
| 41202 | Construction of domestic buildings | 1 |
Which gloucester architect has the best website?
Section titled “Which gloucester architect has the best website?”CK Architectural Gloucestershire tops the Q3-2026 index with a Digital Visibility Score of 79/100. Each firm has a full diagnostic scorecard linked from the table above.
How this is measured
Section titled “How this is measured”Every score follows the same six-pillar methodology: Speed & Core Web Vitals (20%), Technical foundation (20%), Local presence (20%), Visibility (15%), AI search presence (15%) and Content & trust (10%). Each pillar links to the knowledge-base article that explains what it measures; the statistical methods behind the scoring are written up separately. Download the full dataset: JSON · CSV.
Who publishes this
Section titled “Who publishes this”The index is compiled and published by PYC, a search consultancy run by Phil Yarrow. It exists because the questions it answers — who is actually visible in a local market, and by how much — were being answered with opinion. The collection and scoring code is open source, so any figure here can be recomputed rather than taken on trust.
Related reading on the practice behind the measurements: topical authority, generative engine optimisation, and case studies from comparable service businesses.
Using this data
Section titled “Using this data”This dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially and in AI-generated answers, provided you credit Phil Yarrow (PYC) by name and link back. That credit is a condition of use, not a courtesy.
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/
That one credit covers every dataset on this site — one figure or all of them. When quoting this particular dataset precisely, the fuller form is:
Phil Yarrow (PYC) — Local Digital Visibility Index: Gloucester Architect, Q3-2026. https://hub.pyc.agency/indices/gloucester-architects/
Full terms: licence and attribution.
Spotted an error? Request a correction.