Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 9 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 11.7 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CK Architectural Gloucestershire, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
99
Technical
14
Local presence
59
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
3
this firm sector median leader
Conault Design trails CK Architectural Gloucestershire by 337 points across 5 pillars, but 55% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
CK Architectural Gloucestershire leads the index with 79/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Technical (14 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 76).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 98 · accessibility 85 · best practices 70 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: `<html>` element does not have a `[lang]` attribute; `<td>` elements in a large `<table>` do not have table headers.; Document does not have a main landmark.
Google profile detail
6 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks
53 referring domains · 134 links · rank 72
Site structure
9 pages crawled · 7.2 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Conault Design’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.