Skip to content

blueprint — Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 23 / 100 · Rank 33 of 35

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV66not measured
Technical075−75
Local presence7967+12
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust47.5not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWVnot measured
Technical-75
Local presence+12
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Gloucesternot in top 100
architect Gloucesternot in top 100
architectural services Gloucesternot in top 100
house extension architect Gloucesternot in top 100
planning application architect Gloucesternot in top 100
listed building architect Gloucesternot in top 100
residential architects Gloucesternot in top 100
commercial architects Gloucesternot in top 100
self build architect Gloucesternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Gloucesternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Gloucesternot in top 100
conservation architect Gloucesternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CK Architectural Gloucestershire, on every pillar.
Technical0
Local presence79
Visibility0
AI search presence0

this firm sector median leader

blueprint trails CK Architectural Gloucestershire by 276 points across 3 pillars, but 72% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Gloucester?
Which architect in Gloucester would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Gloucester
I need an architect in Gloucester - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Gloucester
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence791 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical0HTTPS: — · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 75.

CK Architectural Gloucestershire leads the index with 79/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 76).

  1. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest blueprint in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Conault Design#3135/1002 places above you
James Taylor Visualisations#3517/1002 places below you
Richard Falconer Architect#3036/1003 places above you
Morgan Barnfield Construction#2938/1004 places above you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed
Backlinks27 referring domains · 28 links · rank 51
Site structureNot crawled — fetch failed

blueprint’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
  • Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.