Skip to content

Forde Architecture — Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 46 / 100 · Rank 21 of 35

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5966−7
Technical8875+13
Local presence5967−8
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust4547.5−2.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-7
Technical+13
Local presence-8
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-2.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.7 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Gloucesternot in top 100
architect Gloucesternot in top 100
architectural services Gloucesternot in top 100
house extension architect Gloucesternot in top 100
planning application architect Gloucesternot in top 100
listed building architect Gloucesternot in top 100
residential architects Gloucesternot in top 100
commercial architects Gloucesternot in top 100
self build architect Gloucesternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Gloucesternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Gloucesternot in top 100
conservation architect Gloucesternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, CK Architectural Gloucestershire, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV59
Technical88
Local presence59
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust45

this firm sector median leader

Forde Architecture trails CK Architectural Gloucestershire by 224 points across 6 pillars, but 79% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Gloucester?
Which architect in Gloucester would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Gloucester
I need an architect in Gloucester - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Gloucester
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust45about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 335 words · last changed: 2078 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

CK Architectural Gloucestershire leads the index with 79/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 76); Content & trust (45 vs 70).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Forde Architecture in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Stantec#1948/1002 places above you
Ceri ap Dafydd Architect#2345/1002 places below you
Port Architects Limited#1849/1003 places above you
Manifest Design Workshop Ltd#2444/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 59 · accessibility 84 · best practices 96 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Largest Contentful Paint; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.; Render-blocking requests
Google profile detail3 photos · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks24 referring domains · 27 links · rank 0 · 1 broken
Site structure24 pages crawled · 12.7 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap3 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 2078 days old · 2 of 3 sampled URLs resolve

Forde Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.