Skip to content

CK Architectural Gloucestershire — Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 79 / 100 · Rank 1 of 35

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6266−4
Technical10075+25
Local presence6767level
Visibility760+76
AI search presence1000+100
Content & trust7047.5+22.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-4
Technical+25
Local presence0
Visibility+76
AI search presence+100
Content & trust+22.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 10.4 years ago.
Ranks for 12 of 12 keywords, average position 2.2, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Gloucester#4
architect Gloucester#1
architectural services Gloucester#1
house extension architect Gloucester#2
planning application architect Gloucester#2
listed building architect Gloucester#6
residential architects Gloucester#2
commercial architects Gloucester#1
self build architect Gloucester#2
loft conversion architect Gloucester#1
barn conversion architect Gloucester#1
conservation architect Gloucester#3
Named in 5 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Gloucester?cited by domain
Which architect in Gloucester would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Gloucestercited by domain
I need an architect in Gloucester - who should I contact?cited by domain
Conservation architects in Gloucestercited by domain
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 2,297 words · last changed: 3809 days ago
Visibility76ranks for 12 of 12 keywords · average position 2.2 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.
  1. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
  2. Restart Google review generation and complete the Business Profile to close the local-pack gap.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest CK Architectural Gloucestershire in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
PSK Architect#371/1002 places below you
RE-Design Architects#464/1003 places below you
CMS Group#563/1004 places below you
Roberts Limbrick Ltd#663/1005 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 59 · accessibility 83 · best practices 96 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.; Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail5 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks38 referring domains · 958 links · rank 230
Site structure25 pages crawled · 58.1 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 5% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap3 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 256 days old · 3 of 3 sampled URLs resolve

CK Architectural Gloucestershire’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Local presence (67/100) — read local case studies on what moving these signals did for comparable service businesses. Background on analysing this pillar: local presence.
  • Content & trust (70/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing this pillar: content & trust.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.