Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Technical
67
Local presence
81
Visibility
26
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
ONE Creative environments (ONE) trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 119 points across 4 pillars, but 69% of that is Visibility and AI search presence alone.
Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (26 vs 68); AI search presence (0 vs 40); Technical (67 vs 100).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 56 · accessibility 65 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links do not have a discernible name; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Improve image delivery
Google profile detail
1 photo · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Visibility (26/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.