Maverick Visuals — Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 51 / 100 · Rank 15 of 25

Digital Visibility Score51/100Rank 15 of 25Problems found1The site has not changed in a long timeFurthest behind-17Visibility: 0 against a sector median of 17

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	56	61	−5
Technical	100	75	+25
Local presence	81	78	+3
Visibility	0	17	−17
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	37	37	level

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-5
Technical		+25
Local presence		+3
Visibility		-17
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		0

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

• Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 2.7 years ago.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Worcester	not in top 100
architect Worcester	not in top 100
architectural services Worcester	not in top 100
house extension architect Worcester	not in top 100
planning application architect Worcester	not in top 100
listed building architect Worcester	not in top 100
residential architects Worcester	not in top 100
commercial architects Worcester	not in top 100
self build architect Worcester	not in top 100
loft conversion architect Worcester	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Worcester	not in top 100
conservation architect Worcester	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		56
Technical		100
Local presence		81
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		37

this firm sector median leader

Maverick Visuals trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 124 points across 4 pillars, but 87% of that is Visibility and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Worcester?
✗	Which architect in Worcester would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Worcester
✗	I need an architect in Worcester - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Worcester

Local presence

Google Business Profile.

Rating	4.2 / 5
Reviews	5
Locations	1
Reviews in last 90 days	0
Address matches website	yes

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	37	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 1,750 words · last changed: 973 days ago
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	81	5 reviews · rated 4.2 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

• Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 17.

How this compares to the leader

Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 68); AI search presence (0 vs 40); Content & trust (37 vs 49).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Maverick Visuals in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
TR Architectural Services	#13	53/100	2 places above you
ONE Creative environments (ONE)	#17	48/100	2 places below you
Lett & Sweetland	#12	54/100	3 places above you
KKE Architects	#18	47/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 58 · accessibility 93 · best practices 74 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Improve image delivery; LCP request discovery; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Google profile detail	37 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 1 of 5 reviews are one star
Backlinks	19 referring domains · 19 links · rank 0
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 38 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 66 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	66 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 614 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

Maverick Visuals’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

• Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
• AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

↑ Ranked aboveZebra Architects#14 · 52/100 Full indexAll 25 firms ↓ Ranked belowHERLIG ARCHITECTURE#16 · 50/100

---

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.