Skip to content

Lett & Sweetland — Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 54 / 100 · Rank 12 of 25

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8561+24
Technical7575level
Local presence7378−5
Visibility417−13
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust4037+3
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+24
Technical0
Local presence-5
Visibility-13
AI search presence+20
Content & trust+3
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 21, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Worcesternot in top 100
architect Worcesternot in top 100
architectural services Worcesternot in top 100
house extension architect Worcesternot in top 100
planning application architect Worcesternot in top 100
listed building architect Worcesternot in top 100
residential architects Worcesternot in top 100
commercial architects Worcesternot in top 100
self build architect Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Worcesternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Worcester#21
conservation architect Worcesternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV85
Technical75
Local presence73
Visibility4
AI search presence20
Content & trust40

this firm sector median leader

Lett & Sweetland trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 130 points across 5 pillars, but 68% of that is Visibility and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Worcester?
Which architect in Worcester would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Worcester
I need an architect in Worcester - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating3.7 / 5
Reviews3
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust40about page: no · team page: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 72 words
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 21 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence733 reviews · rated 3.7 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Visibility: 4/100, below the sector median of 17.

Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (4 vs 68); Technical (75 vs 100); AI search presence (20 vs 40).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Lett & Sweetland in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Keystone Architecture and Design LTD#1055/1002 places above you
Zebra Architects#1452/1002 places below you
JPL Architectural Design Ltd.#955/1003 places above you
Maverick Visuals#1551/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 85 · accessibility 87 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements do not have a title; Buttons do not have an accessible name
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks51 referring domains · 74 links · rank 93
Site structure25 pages crawled · 15.9 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, team 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap43 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 439 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Lett & Sweetland’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.