Digital Visibility Score: 38 / 100 · Rank 46 of 55
Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV +6 Technical -46 Local presence -17 Visibility +25 AI search presence 0 Content & trust 0
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixing No XML sitemap found Search engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not. Worth fixing No structured data on the homepage Nothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms. Worth fixing No mobile viewport tag The page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one. Worth fixing Very little published content The homepage carries 57 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote. Worth knowing The site has not changed in a long time The homepage last reported a change 6.6 years ago.
Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 40.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position builders Worcester #9 construction companies Worcester #66 best builders Worcester #26 house extensions Worcester not in top 100 loft conversions Worcester not in top 100 new build developers Worcester not in top 100 commercial construction Worcester not in top 100 groundworks contractors Worcester not in top 100 renovation builders Worcester #20 builders St John's #44 builders Barbourne #78 construction St John's not in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV 67 Technical 29 Local presence 59 Visibility 25 AI search presence 0 Content & trust 37
this firm sector median leader
S & S Builders trails General Builds by 153 points across 6 pillars, but 67% of that is Technical and Local presence alone.
Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
renovation builders Worcester#20
1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.
Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best builders in Worcester? ✗ Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension? ✗ Top rated building contractors in Worcester ✗ I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact? ✗ Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 37 about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: no · homepage: 57 words · last changed: 2412 days ago Visibility 25 ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 40.5 · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 59 0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days Technical 29 HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: no
Technical: 29/100, below the sector median of 75.
Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 76.
General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (29 vs 100); Local presence (59 vs 90); Content & trust (37 vs 58).
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Add valid LocalBusiness/GeneralContractor schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
The firms nearest S & S Builders in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 77 · accessibility 67 · best practices 59 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document request latency; Uses deprecated APIs; Render-blocking requests Google profile detail 1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed Backlinks 46 referring domains · 48 links · rank 51 Site structure 1 pages crawled · 6 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
S & S Builders’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .