Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 176 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 63 · accessibility 96 · best practices 74 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; Forced reflow; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail
claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
32 referring domains · 43 links · rank 33
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 34 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 3% of links use a generic anchor
Bourne Site Services’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.