McMinn Developments — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 35 / 100 · Rank 47 of 55

Digital Visibility Score35/100Rank 47 of 55 Critical problem1The site is not served over HTTPS Furthest behind-46Technical: 29 against a sector median of 75

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	67	61	+6
Technical	29	75	−46
Local presence	67	76	−9
Visibility	0	0	level
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	20	37	−17

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		+6
Technical		-46
Local presence		-9
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		-17

Problems found

1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 16 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.8 years ago.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
builders Worcester	not in top 100
construction companies Worcester	not in top 100
best builders Worcester	not in top 100
house extensions Worcester	not in top 100
loft conversions Worcester	not in top 100
new build developers Worcester	not in top 100
commercial construction Worcester	not in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcester	not in top 100
renovation builders Worcester	not in top 100
builders St John's	not in top 100
builders Barbourne	not in top 100
construction St John's	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		67
Technical		29
Local presence		67
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		20

this firm sector median leader

McMinn Developments trails General Builds by 187 points across 6 pillars, but 58% of that is Technical and Content & trust alone.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best builders in Worcester?
✗	Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
✗	Top rated building contractors in Worcester
✗	I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
✗	Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	20	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 16 words · last changed: 2111 days ago
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	67	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	29	HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: no

Key findings

Technical: 29/100, below the sector median of 75.
Content & trust: 20/100, below the sector median of 37.

How this compares to the leader

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (29 vs 100); Content & trust (20 vs 58); Visibility (0 vs 32).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest McMinn Developments in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Bourne Site Services	#45	38/100	2 places above you
Straight-Line Group Services	#49	24/100	2 places below you
MITRE OAK LTD	#44	39/100	3 places above you
Britannia Site Solutions Limited	#50	23/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	Company 06599503 · 18.3 years old · active · SIC 68100
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 72 · accessibility 98 · best practices 74 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Improve image delivery; Render-blocking requests
Google profile detail	42 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks	59 referring domains · 67 links · rank 51
Site structure	11 pages crawled · 4.7 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor

Where to get this fixed

McMinn Developments’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.