Skip to content

Straight-Line Group Services — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 24 / 100 · Rank 49 of 55

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV2961−32
Technical075−75
Local presence8176+5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust37not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-32
Technical-75
Local presence+5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Worcesternot in top 100
construction companies Worcesternot in top 100
best builders Worcesternot in top 100
house extensions Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversions Worcesternot in top 100
new build developers Worcesternot in top 100
commercial construction Worcesternot in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcesternot in top 100
renovation builders Worcesternot in top 100
builders St John'snot in top 100
builders Barbournenot in top 100
construction St John'snot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV29
Technical0
Local presence81
Visibility0
AI search presence0

this firm sector median leader

Straight-Line Group Services trails General Builds by 202 points across 5 pillars, but 70% of that is Technical and Speed & CWV alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Worcester?
Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Worcester
I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating3.9 / 5
Reviews7
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence817 reviews · rated 3.9 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical0HTTPS: — · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Speed & CWV: 29/100, below the sector median of 61.
  • Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 75.

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); Speed & CWV (29 vs 70); Visibility (0 vs 32).

  1. Add valid LocalBusiness/GeneralContractor schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Straight-Line Group Services in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
McMinn Developments#4735/1002 places above you
Merseyside Fencing Ltd#5123/1002 places below you
S & S Builders#4638/1003 places above you
County Property Services (Worcs)#5219/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 15803855 · 2.2 years old · active · SIC 42110, 78109, 78200
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 38 · accessibility 91 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; LCP request discovery; Avoid large layout shifts
Google profile detail7 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 2 of 7 reviews are one star
Backlinks15 referring domains · 130 links · rank 217 · 38 broken
Site structureNot crawled — fetch failed

Straight-Line Group Services’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
  • Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.