County Property Services (Worcs) — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 19 / 100 · Rank 52 of 55

Digital Visibility Score19/100Rank 52 of 55Problems found1No XML sitemap foundFurthest behind-75Technical: 0 against a sector median of 75

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	—	61	not measured
Technical	0	75	−75
Local presence	67	76	−9
Visibility	0	0	level
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	—	37	not measured

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		not measured
Technical		-75
Local presence		-9
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		not measured

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

• Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
builders Worcester	not in top 100
construction companies Worcester	not in top 100
best builders Worcester	not in top 100
house extensions Worcester	not in top 100
loft conversions Worcester	not in top 100
new build developers Worcester	not in top 100
commercial construction Worcester	not in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcester	not in top 100
renovation builders Worcester	not in top 100
builders St John's	not in top 100
builders Barbourne	not in top 100
construction St John's	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.

Technical		0
Local presence		67
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0

this firm sector median leader

County Property Services (Worcs) trails General Builds by 175 points across 4 pillars, but 75% of that is Technical and Visibility alone.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best builders in Worcester?
✗	Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
✗	Top rated building contractors in Worcester
✗	I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
✗	Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	67	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	0	HTTPS: — · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —

Key findings

• Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 75.

How this compares to the leader

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 32); Local presence (67 vs 90).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

1. Add valid LocalBusiness/GeneralContractor schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest County Property Services (Worcs) in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Britannia Site Solutions Limited	#50	23/100	2 places above you
E L Kennedy Ltd	#54	18/100	2 places below you
Straight-Line Group Services	#49	24/100	3 places above you
Real Group of Companies Limited	#55	17/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	Company 12836045 · 6 years old · active · SIC 41100, 41202, 43220, 98000
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Google profile detail	1 photo · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks	39 referring domains · 42 links · rank 0
Site structure	Not crawled — fetch failed

Where to get this fixed

County Property Services (Worcs)‘s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

• Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
• Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

↑ Ranked aboveMerseyside Fencing Ltd#51 · 23/100 Full indexAll 55 firms ↓ Ranked belowBaker Homes & Developments Ltd#53 · 18/100

---

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.