Digital Visibility Score: 23 / 100 · Rank 51 of 55
Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV not measured Technical -75 Local presence +6 Visibility 0 AI search presence 0 Content & trust not measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixing No XML sitemap found Search engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position builders Worcester not in top 100 construction companies Worcester not in top 100 best builders Worcester not in top 100 house extensions Worcester not in top 100 loft conversions Worcester not in top 100 new build developers Worcester not in top 100 commercial construction Worcester not in top 100 groundworks contractors Worcester not in top 100 renovation builders Worcester not in top 100 builders St John's not in top 100 builders Barbourne not in top 100 construction St John's not in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Technical 0 Local presence 82 Visibility 0 AI search presence 0
Merseyside Fencing Ltd trails General Builds by 160 points across 4 pillars, but 83% of that is Technical and Visibility alone.
Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best builders in Worcester? ✗ Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension? ✗ Top rated building contractors in Worcester ✗ I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact? ✗ Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating 4.8 / 5 Reviews 6 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 2 Address matches website yes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Visibility 0 ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 82 6 reviews · rated 4.8 · 2 new in 90 days Technical 0 HTTPS: — · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 75.
General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 32); AI search presence (0 vs 20).
Add valid LocalBusiness/GeneralContractor schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Merseyside Fencing Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset Google profile detail 52 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 6 reviews are one star Backlinks 34 referring domains · 57 links · rank 114 · 53 broken Site structure Not crawled — fetch failed
Merseyside Fencing Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical .Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility .
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .