Skip to content

DJD Architects — Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 57 / 100 · Rank 7 of 25

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV10061+39
Technical3375−42
Local presence7978+1
Visibility017−17
AI search presence600+60
Content & trust37not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+39
Technical-42
Local presence+1
Visibility-17
AI search presence+60
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Worcesternot in top 100
architect Worcesternot in top 100
architectural services Worcesternot in top 100
house extension architect Worcesternot in top 100
planning application architect Worcesternot in top 100
listed building architect Worcesternot in top 100
residential architects Worcesternot in top 100
commercial architects Worcesternot in top 100
self build architect Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Worcesternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Worcesternot in top 100
conservation architect Worcesternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV100
Technical33
Local presence79
Visibility0
AI search presence60

this firm sector median leader

DJD Architects trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 141 points across 3 pillars, but 96% of that is Visibility and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence.

Named in 3 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Worcester?
Which architect in Worcester would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Worcester
I need an architect in Worcester - who should I contact?named
Conservation architects in Worcestercited by domain
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence791 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical33HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 33/100, below the sector median of 75.
  • Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 17.

Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 68); Technical (33 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest DJD Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Vivid Architects#560/1002 places above you
JPL Architectural Design Ltd.#955/1002 places below you
Randall Architectural limited#461/1003 places above you
Keystone Architecture and Design LTD#1055/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 100 · accessibility 73 · best practices 96 · SEO 80 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; Page has unsuccessful HTTP status code; Document does not have a meta description
Google profile detail5 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks47 referring domains · 55 links · rank 251 · 2 broken
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 403

DJD Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
  • Technical (33/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.