Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
100
Technical
33
Local presence
79
Visibility
0
AI search presence
60
this firm sector median leader
DJD Architects trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 141 points across 3 pillars, but 96% of that is Visibility and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 100 · accessibility 73 · best practices 96 · SEO 80 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; Page has unsuccessful HTTP status code; Document does not have a meta description
Google profile detail
5 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
DJD Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
Technical (33/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.