Skip to content

Randall Architectural limited — Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 61 / 100 · Rank 4 of 25

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5661−5
Technical8875+13
Local presence9178+13
Visibility6817+51
AI search presence00level
Content & trust4037+3
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-5
Technical+13
Local presence+13
Visibility+51
AI search presence0
Content & trust+3
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Ranks for 12 of 12 keywords, average position 13.3, in the local 3-pack for 11 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Worcester#2
architect Worcester#1
architectural services Worcester#7
house extension architect Worcester#4
planning application architect Worcester#9
listed building architect Worcester#15
residential architects Worcester#1
commercial architects Worcester#9
self build architect Worcester#2
loft conversion architect Worcester#35
barn conversion architect Worcester#64
conservation architect Worcester#11
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV56
Technical88
Local presence91
Visibility68
AI search presence0
Content & trust40

this firm sector median leader

Randall Architectural limited trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 61 points across 3 pillars, but 85% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Local presence, Visibility.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
conservation architect Worcester#11
listed building architect Worcester#15

2 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Worcester?
Which architect in Worcester would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Worcester
I need an architect in Worcester - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.9 / 5
Reviews20
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • planning side of the project6
  • communication4
  • extension plans3
  • thoughtful design3
  • planning application3
  • tradesmen recommendations2
  • value for money2
  • concept solutions2
  • approachable2
  • attentive2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust40about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 801 words
Visibility68ranks for 12 of 12 keywords · average position 13.3 · local 3-pack: 11
Local presence9120 reviews · rated 4.9 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 40); Technical (88 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Randall Architectural limited in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
EP Architecture Ltd#267/1002 places above you
Nick Joyce Architects LTD#659/1002 places below you
Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester#168/1003 places above you
DJD Architects#757/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 49 · accessibility 100 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Reduce JavaScript execution time; Improve image delivery
Google profile detail3 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 20 reviews are one star
Backlinks26 referring domains · 47 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 7 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 1 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap1 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 31 days old · 1 of 1 sampled URLs resolve

Randall Architectural limited’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.