Skip to content

Vivid Architects — Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 60 / 100 · Rank 5 of 25

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8961+28
Technical8875+13
Local presence7878level
Visibility017−17
AI search presence400+40
Content & trust3337−4
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+28
Technical+13
Local presence0
Visibility-17
AI search presence+40
Content & trust-4
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 10.5 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Worcesternot in top 100
architect Worcesternot in top 100
architectural services Worcesternot in top 100
house extension architect Worcesternot in top 100
planning application architect Worcesternot in top 100
listed building architect Worcesternot in top 100
residential architects Worcesternot in top 100
commercial architects Worcesternot in top 100
self build architect Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Worcesternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Worcesternot in top 100
conservation architect Worcesternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV89
Technical88
Local presence78
Visibility0
AI search presence40
Content & trust33

this firm sector median leader

Vivid Architects trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 103 points across 4 pillars, but 82% of that is Visibility and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Worcester?
Which architect in Worcester would you recommend for a house extension?named
Top rated architectural practices in Worcester
I need an architect in Worcester - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Worcesternamed
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust33about page: no · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: no · homepage: 769 words · last changed: 3830 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence782 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 17.

Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 68); Content & trust (33 vs 49); Technical (88 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Vivid Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Holmes Architects#362/1002 places above you
DJD Architects#757/1002 places below you
EP Architecture Ltd#267/1003 places above you
Glazzard Architects Ltd#857/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 89 · accessibility 96 · best practices 74 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; Minimize main-thread work; Browser errors were logged to the console
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks67 referring domains · 108 links · rank 80
Site structure1 pages crawled · 44 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 8 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap9 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 607 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Vivid Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Visibility (0/100) and Content & trust (33/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.