Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
69
Technical
88
Local presence
67
Visibility
38
AI search presence
40
Content & trust
50
this firm sector median leader
Holmes Architects trails Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester by 60 points across 3 pillars, but 80% of that is Visibility and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence, Content & trust.
Taylor & Co Architects - Worcester leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (38 vs 68); Local presence (67 vs 85); Technical (88 vs 100).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 14986587 · 3.2 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 79 · accessibility 98 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Reduce unused JavaScript; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Google profile detail
1 photo · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
47 referring domains · 182 links · rank 59
Site structure
22 pages crawled · 14 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap
5 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 243 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Holmes Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (38/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.