Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Swindon Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Drove Vets Stratton | Swindon, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
60
Technical
0
Local presence
99
Visibility
41
AI search presence
20
this firm sector median leader
Shaw Veterinary Centre trails Drove Vets Stratton | Swindon by 248 points across 4 pillars, but 73% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Drove Vets Stratton | Swindon leads the index with 93/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 100); AI search presence (20 vs 100); Visibility (41 vs 87).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 75 · accessibility 93 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail
51 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 9 of 236 reviews are one star
Shaw Veterinary Centre’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.