The Alanbrookes Group — Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 53 / 100 · Rank 22 of 41

Digital Visibility Score53/100Rank 22 of 41 Furthest behind-20Local presence: 59 against a sector median of 79

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	56	65.5	−9.5
Technical	100	75	+25
Local presence	59	79	−20
Visibility	0	13	−13
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	100	54	+46

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-9.5
Technical		+25
Local presence		-20
Visibility		-13
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		+46

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
accountants Gloucester	not in top 100
chartered accountants Gloucester	not in top 100
best accountants Gloucester	not in top 100
small business accountant Gloucester	not in top 100
tax advisor Gloucester	not in top 100
bookkeeping Gloucester	not in top 100
self assessment help Gloucester	not in top 100
company accounts Gloucester	not in top 100
payroll services Gloucester	not in top 100
accountants Quedgeley	not in top 100
accountants Hucclecote	not in top 100
bookkeeping Quedgeley	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.

Technical		100
Local presence		59
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		100

this firm sector median leader

The Alanbrookes Group trails Griffiths Marshall by 122 points across 3 pillars, but 90% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best accountants in Gloucester?
✗	Which accountant in Gloucester would you recommend for a small business?
✗	Top rated chartered accountants in Gloucester
✗	I need an accountant in Gloucester - who should I contact?
✗	Best accountants in Quedgeley, Gloucester

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	100	about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,296 words
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	59	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 79.
Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 13.

How this compares to the leader

Griffiths Marshall leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 50); Local presence (59 vs 71).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest The Alanbrookes Group in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Gloucester Cloud Accountants	#20	53/100	2 places above you
Padam Walburn Accounting Services	#24	51/100	2 places below you
Abaqus	#19	55/100	3 places above you
PCD Accountancy Limited	#25	51/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 40 · accessibility 90 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Reduce unused JavaScript; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail	1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks	64 referring domains · 205 links · rank 159 · 122 broken
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 104 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 206 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	206 URLs listed

Where to get this fixed

The Alanbrookes Group’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.