Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical
100
Local presence
76
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
35
this firm sector median leader
Accounting for the Ad-Venture trails Griffiths Marshall by 175 points across 3 pillars, but 71% of that is Content & trust and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 70 · accessibility 65 · best practices 100 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Document does not have a meta description; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail
1 photo · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
26 referring domains · 88 links · rank 0
Site structure
8 pages crawled · 22.9 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 4% of links use a generic anchor
Accounting for the Ad-Venture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.