Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
69
Technical
100
Local presence
88
Visibility
37
AI search presence
40
Content & trust
20
this firm sector median leader
Constructs Building trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 86 points across 3 pillars, but 93% of that is Content & trust and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Visibility, AI search presence.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 78 · accessibility 88 · best practices 73 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Forced reflow; Browser errors were logged to the console; Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools
Google profile detail
45 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 19 reviews are one star
Backlinks
30 referring domains · 36 links · rank 62
Site structure
12 pages crawled · 15.5 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Constructs Building’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Content & trust (20/100) and Visibility (37/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing these pillars: content & trust, visibility.