Digital Visibility Score: 68 / 100 · Rank 1 of 52
Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV +12 Technical +25 Local presence +21 Visibility +31 AI search presence 0 Content & trust +51
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 2, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position builders Cheltenham not in top 100 construction companies Cheltenham not in top 100 best builders Cheltenham not in top 100 house extensions Cheltenham #2 loft conversions Cheltenham not in top 100 new build developers Cheltenham not in top 100 commercial construction Cheltenham not in top 100 groundworks contractors Cheltenham not in top 100 renovation builders Cheltenham not in top 100 builders Montpellier not in top 100 builders Charlton Kings not in top 100 construction Montpellier not in top 100
Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best builders in Cheltenham? ✗ Which construction company in Cheltenham would you recommend for an extension? ✗ Top rated building contractors in Cheltenham ✗ I need a builder in Cheltenham - who should I contact? ✗ Best construction firms in Montpellier, Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating 4.8 / 5 Reviews 64 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 3 Address matches website yes
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile) 13.9s one throttled load on a datacentre machine Field (real users) 2.4s 75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 5.8× the real-user figure. Both agree the site is performing acceptably for real visitors.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
conservatory replacement 15 polite staff 6 tidiness 4 amenable installers 3 helpful team 3 design advice 3 double glazed design 2 roof repair 2 plasterwork 2 competitive quote 2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 91 about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 2,271 words · last changed: 473 days ago Visibility 31 ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 2 · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 97 64 reviews · rated 4.8 · 3 new in 90 days Technical 100 HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest The Little Conservatory Company LTD in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House Company 09701937 · 11.1 years old · active · SIC 43342 Real-user speed (CrUX) LCP 2395ms · INP 179ms · CLS 0 · passes Core Web Vitals Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 57 · accessibility 93 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Improve image delivery; Use efficient cache lifetimes Google profile detail 35 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 1 of 64 reviews are one star Backlinks 168 referring domains · 699 links · rank 231 · 27 broken Site structure 25 pages crawled · 221 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
The Little Conservatory Company LTD’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .