Skip to content

BRG Technologies — Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 57 / 100 · Rank 6 of 52

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6763+4
Technical10075+25
Local presence8576+9
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust6640+26
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+4
Technical+25
Local presence+9
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+26
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 3.8 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
construction companies Cheltenhamnot in top 100
best builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extensions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
new build developers Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial construction Cheltenhamnot in top 100
groundworks contractors Cheltenhamnot in top 100
renovation builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
builders Montpelliernot in top 100
builders Charlton Kingsnot in top 100
construction Montpelliernot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV67
Technical100
Local presence85
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust66

this firm sector median leader

BRG Technologies trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 76 points across 4 pillars, but 74% of that is Visibility and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Cheltenham?
Which construction company in Cheltenham would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Cheltenham
I need a builder in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in Montpellier, Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.8 / 5
Reviews6
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust66about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 440 words · last changed: 1385 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence856 reviews · rated 4.8 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 31); Content & trust (66 vs 91); Local presence (85 vs 97).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest BRG Technologies in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
DP Carpentry and Building Ltd#461/1002 places above you
Perks Building Contractors Ltd#856/1002 places below you
Barthorp Building#364/1003 places above you
KFM Construction#955/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 07632025 · 15.3 years old · active · SIC 70100
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 67 · accessibility 83 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Links do not have descriptive text
Google profile detail5 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 6 reviews are one star
Backlinks54 referring domains · 2036 links · rank 235 · 2 broken
Site structure8 pages crawled · 36.3 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 6% of links use a generic anchor

BRG Technologies’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.