Skip to content

RE-Design Architects — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 74 / 100 · Rank 1 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5863−5
Technical10075+25
Local presence8873+15
Visibility490+49
AI search presence800+80
Content & trust5335+18
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-5
Technical+25
Local presence+15
Visibility+49
AI search presence+80
Content & trust+18
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6.4 years ago.
Ranks for 11 of 12 keywords, average position 17.2, in the local 3-pack for 2 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenham#7
architect Cheltenham#5
architectural services Cheltenham#1
house extension architect Cheltenham#7
planning application architect Cheltenham#2
listed building architect Cheltenham#27
residential architects Cheltenham#15
commercial architects Cheltenham#17
self build architect Cheltenham#7
loft conversion architect Cheltenham#90
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenham#11
Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
conservation architect Cheltenham#11
residential architects Cheltenham#15
commercial architects Cheltenham#17

3 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 4 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?cited by domain
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenhamnamed
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?cited by domain
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.9 / 5
Reviews11
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • planning permission support2
  • supportive staff2
  • turnaround time2
  • recommendation2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust53about page: no · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,629 words · last changed: 2332 days ago
Visibility49ranks for 11 of 12 keywords · average position 17.2 · local 3-pack: 2
Local presence8811 reviews · rated 4.9 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.
  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest RE-Design Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
PSK Architect#372/1002 places below you
Arkipad#470/1003 places below you
CROE Architects#570/1004 places below you
Mekkara Architectural Consultants#668/1005 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 62 · accessibility 92 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail17 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 11 reviews are one star
Backlinks45 referring domains · 171 links · rank 13
Site structure1 pages crawled · 36 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 7 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap8 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 440 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

RE-Design Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Visibility (49/100) and Content & trust (53/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.