Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 62 · accessibility 92 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail
17 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 11 reviews are one star
Backlinks
45 referring domains · 171 links · rank 13
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 36 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 7 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
8 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 440 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
RE-Design Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (49/100) and Content & trust (53/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.