Skip to content

CROE Architects — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 70 / 100 · Rank 5 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5963−4
Technical10075+25
Local presence8673+13
Visibility640+64
AI search presence400+40
Content & trust4935+14
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-4
Technical+25
Local presence+13
Visibility+64
AI search presence+40
Content & trust+14
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6 years ago.
Ranks for 12 of 12 keywords, average position 6.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenham#18
architect Cheltenham#12
architectural services Cheltenham#3
house extension architect Cheltenham#4
planning application architect Cheltenham#7
listed building architect Cheltenham#7
residential architects Cheltenham#3
commercial architects Cheltenham#2
self build architect Cheltenham#1
loft conversion architect Cheltenham#2
barn conversion architect Cheltenham#9
conservation architect Cheltenham#10
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV59
Technical100
Local presence86
Visibility64
AI search presence40
Content & trust49

this firm sector median leader

CROE Architects trails RE-Design Architects by 46 points across 3 pillars, but 96% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical, Visibility.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
architect Cheltenham#12
architects Cheltenham#18

2 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?named
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews7
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • planning permission3
  • planning3
  • single storey extension2
  • transparent fees2
  • drawings2
  • attention to detail2
  • communication2
  • ideas2
  • pricing2
  • fees2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust49about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 676 words · last changed: 2192 days ago
Visibility64ranks for 12 of 12 keywords · average position 6.5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence867 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (40 vs 80).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest CROE Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
PSK Architect#372/1002 places above you
extendArchitecture#767/1002 places below you
RRA Architects#274/1003 places above you
Coombes Everitt Architects Limited#866/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 61 · accessibility 81 · best practices 96 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Skip links are not focusable.; Render-blocking requests; Avoid multiple page redirects
Google profile detail47 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 7 reviews are one star
Backlinks118 referring domains · 336 links · rank 187 · 147 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 38 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 10 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap10 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 68 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

CROE Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.