Skip to content
PYC HUB

Jackson Architects Ltd — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 56 / 100 · Rank 16 of 59

Digital Visibility Score56/100Rank 16 of 59 · top 26%Furthest behind-1Speed & CWV: 62 against a sector median of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Section titled “Pillar breakdown vs sector median”
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6263−1
Technical10075+25
Local presence8073+7
Visibility250+25
AI search presence00level
Content & trust4235+7
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-1
Technical+25
Local presence+7
Visibility+25
AI search presence0
Content & trust+7

Where this firm ranks

Section titled “Where this firm ranks”
Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 49.3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenham#37
architect Cheltenham#41
architectural services Cheltenham#59
house extension architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
planning application architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
listed building architect Cheltenham#29
residential architects Cheltenham#56
commercial architects Cheltenham#74
self build architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100

The gap to the leader

Section titled “The gap to the leader”
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV62
Technical100
Local presence80
Visibility25
AI search presence0
Content & trust42

this firm sector median leader

Jackson Architects Ltd trails RE-Design Architects by 123 points across 4 pillars, but 85% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical.

AI search presence

Section titled “AI search presence”
Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?
✗Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?
✗Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
✗I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
✗Conservation architects in Cheltenham

Local presence

Section titled “Local presence”
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews6
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes

What customers talk about

Section titled “What customers talk about”
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • planning issues3
  • building3
  • engagement with builder2
  • technical support2
  • responsiveness2
  • space optimization2
  • advice2

Why this score

Section titled “Why this score”
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust42about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 469 words · last changed: 159 days ago
Visibility25ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 49.3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence806 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

Section titled “Key findings”
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

How this compares to the leader

Section titled “How this compares to the leader”

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Visibility (25 vs 49); Content & trust (42 vs 53).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Section titled “Top fixes (ranked by impact)”
  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

Section titled “Firms ranked near this one”
The firms nearest Jackson Architects Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Lewis Critchley Architects#1457/1002 places above you
Falconer & Gilbert Scott Architects#1854/1002 places below you
PRAiA studio#1358/1003 places above you
Port Architects Limited#1954/1003 places below you

Context (not scored)

Section titled “Context (not scored)”
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 62 · accessibility 84 · best practices 81 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Forced reflow; Font display
Google profile detail8 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed · 0 of 6 reviews are one star
Backlinks183 referring domains · 315 links · rank 79 · 5 broken
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 403

Where to get this fixed

Section titled “Where to get this fixed”

Jackson Architects Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.