TEA Architects — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 61 / 100 · Rank 9 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	69	63	+6
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	90	78.5	+11.5
Visibility	25	0	+25
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	53	37	+16

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		+6
Technical		+12
Local presence		+11.5
Visibility		+25
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		+16

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 23.8, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	#39
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	#46
house extension architect Bath	#5
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	not in top 100
residential architects Bath	#27
commercial architects Bath	#23
self build architect Bath	#3
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		69
Technical		100
Local presence		90
Visibility		25
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		53

this firm sector median leader

TEA Architects trails Designscape Architects by 118 points across 3 pillars, but 76% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence, Content & trust.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✗	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Local presence

Google Business Profile.

Rating	5 / 5
Reviews	14
Locations	1
Reviews in last 90 days	0
Address matches website	yes

What customers talk about

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.

planning process5
smooth process4
collaboration4
budget adherence3
consultant3
open plan2
responsive2
sensible pricing2
contractor2
promptness2

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	53	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 635 words · last changed: 571 days ago
Visibility	25	ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 23.8 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	90	14 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Speed & CWV (69 vs 99); Visibility (25 vs 53).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest TEA Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Mark Wray Architects	#7	62/100	2 places above you
Maack Architects	#11	60/100	2 places below you
DKA	#6	63/100	3 places above you
Stride Treglown Bath	#12	60/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	Company 15868661 · 2.1 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 77 · accessibility 89 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Document does not have a main landmark.
Google profile detail	20 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 14 reviews are one star
Backlinks	39 referring domains · 159 links · rank 55
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 15 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 7% of links use a generic anchor · 34 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	34 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 35 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

TEA Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.
Visibility (25/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.