Skip to content

DKA — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 63 / 100 · Rank 6 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6563+2
Technical10088+12
Local presence8178.5+2.5
Visibility310+31
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust5837+21
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+2
Technical+12
Local presence+2.5
Visibility+31
AI search presence+20
Content & trust+21
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 13.1 years ago.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 6.3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bath#6
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bath#4
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bath#11
commercial architects Bath#4
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV65
Technical100
Local presence81
Visibility31
AI search presence20
Content & trust58

this firm sector median leader

DKA trails Designscape Architects by 105 points across 4 pillars, but 70% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
residential architects Bath#11

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?cited by domain
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.7 / 5
Reviews3
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust58about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 182 words · last changed: 4773 days ago
Visibility31ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 6.3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence813 reviews · rated 4.7 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 60); Speed & CWV (65 vs 99); Visibility (31 vs 53).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest DKA in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Lacey Architecture Ltd#465/1002 places above you
Mitchell Eley Gould Architects#861/1002 places below you
Aaron Evans Architects Ltd#368/1003 places above you
TEA Architects#961/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 73 · accessibility 69 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Elements with an ARIA `[role]` that require children to contain a specific `[role]` are missing some or all of those required children.; Document request latency; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail6 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks116 referring domains · 307 links · rank 176 · 299 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 99 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 25 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap26 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 132 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

DKA’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.