Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
65
Technical
100
Local presence
81
Visibility
31
AI search presence
20
Content & trust
58
this firm sector median leader
DKA trails Designscape Architects by 105 points across 4 pillars, but 70% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.
Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 60); Speed & CWV (65 vs 99); Visibility (31 vs 53).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 73 · accessibility 69 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Elements with an ARIA `[role]` that require children to contain a specific `[role]` are missing some or all of those required children.; Document request latency; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail
6 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
1 pages crawled · 99 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 25 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
26 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 132 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Visibility (31/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.