Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: Speed & CWV (55 vs 99); Content & trust (30 vs 53); AI search presence (40 vs 60).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 47 · accessibility 98 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Does not use HTTPS; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail
27 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
64 referring domains · 108 links · rank 126
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 49 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 93 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
93 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 270 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Mitchell Eley Gould Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Content & trust (30/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing this pillar: content & trust.