Bright Studio Architects — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 60 / 100 · Rank 10 of 80

Digital Visibility Score60/100Rank 10 of 80 · top 11%Problems found1The site has not changed in a long timeFurthest behind-5Speed & CWV: 58 against a sector median of 63

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	58	63	−5
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	82	78.5	+3.5
Visibility	25	0	+25
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	83	37	+46

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-5
Technical		+12
Local presence		+3.5
Visibility		+25
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		+46

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

• Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 4.2 years ago.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 28.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	#22
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	#32
house extension architect Bath	#34
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	not in top 100
residential architects Bath	#22
commercial architects Bath	#25
self build architect Bath	#36
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		58
Technical		100
Local presence		82
Visibility		25
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		83

this firm sector median leader

Bright Studio Architects trails Designscape Architects by 137 points across 4 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✗	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Local presence

Google Business Profile.

Rating	5 / 5
Reviews	5
Locations	1
Reviews in last 90 days	0
Address matches website	yes

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	83	about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 498 words · last changed: 1545 days ago
Visibility	25	ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 28.5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	82	5 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

• No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Speed & CWV (58 vs 99); Visibility (25 vs 53).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Bright Studio Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Mitchell Eley Gould Architects	#8	61/100	2 places above you
Stride Treglown Bath	#12	60/100	2 places below you
Mark Wray Architects	#7	62/100	3 places above you
KANN ARCHITECTURE	#13	59/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	Company 14135825 · 4.3 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 54 · accessibility 85 · best practices 81 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: LCP request discovery; Forced reflow; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail	1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed · 0 of 5 reviews are one star
Backlinks	17 referring domains · 83 links · rank 0
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 30 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 20 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	20 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 215 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

Bright Studio Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

• AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.
• Visibility (25/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

↑ Ranked aboveTEA Architects#9 · 61/100 Full indexAll 80 firms ↓ Ranked belowMaack Architects#11 · 60/100

---

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.