Stride Treglown Bath — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 60 / 100 · Rank 12 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	75	63	+12
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	81	78.5	+2.5
Visibility	8	0	+8
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	79	37	+42

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		+12
Technical		+12
Local presence		+2.5
Visibility		+8
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		+42

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 2 of 12 keywords, average position 20.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	#5
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	not in top 100
house extension architect Bath	not in top 100
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	not in top 100
residential architects Bath	not in top 100
commercial architects Bath	#36
self build architect Bath	not in top 100
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		75
Technical		100
Local presence		81
Visibility		8
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		79

this firm sector median leader

Stride Treglown Bath trails Designscape Architects by 138 points across 4 pillars, but 76% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✗	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Local presence

Google Business Profile.

Rating	5 / 5
Reviews	4
Locations	1
Reviews in last 90 days	0
Address matches website	yes

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	79	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 476 words · last changed: 0 days ago
Visibility	8	ranks for 2 of 12 keywords · average position 20.5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	81	4 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (8 vs 53); Speed & CWV (75 vs 99).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Stride Treglown Bath in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Bright Studio Architects	#10	60/100	2 places above you
Nash Partnership	#14	59/100	2 places below you
TEA Architects	#9	61/100	3 places above you
Silvan Architects	#15	59/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 82 · accessibility 100 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document request latency; Render-blocking requests; Font display
Google profile detail	1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks	701 referring domains · 2496 links · rank 255 · 26 broken
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 113 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 353 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	353 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 11 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

Stride Treglown Bath’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.
Visibility (8/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.