Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Physiotherapy Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 8.3 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
67
Technical
75
Local presence
65
Visibility
34
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
16
this firm sector median leader
Emma Oldham Osteopath trails Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic by 222 points across 6 pillars, but 53% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone.
Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic leads the index with 83/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Content & trust (16 vs 53); Local presence (65 vs 100).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 69 · accessibility 60 · best practices 78 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Avoid large layout shifts; Reduce unused JavaScript; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Google profile detail
5 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
43 referring domains · 48 links · rank 73
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 13 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Content & trust (16/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing this pillar: content & trust.