Skip to content

W Maggs Construction — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 59 / 100 · Rank 5 of 55

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6561+4
Technical8875+13
Local presence8776+11
Visibility40+4
AI search presence400+40
Content & trust4037+3
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+4
Technical+13
Local presence+11
Visibility+4
AI search presence+40
Content & trust+3
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 20, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Worcesternot in top 100
construction companies Worcester#20
best builders Worcesternot in top 100
house extensions Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversions Worcesternot in top 100
new build developers Worcesternot in top 100
commercial construction Worcesternot in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcesternot in top 100
renovation builders Worcesternot in top 100
builders St John'snot in top 100
builders Barbournenot in top 100
construction St John'snot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV65
Technical88
Local presence87
Visibility4
AI search presence40
Content & trust40

this firm sector median leader

W Maggs Construction trails General Builds by 66 points across 5 pillars, but 70% of that is Visibility and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
construction companies Worcester#20

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Worcester?
Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?cited by domain
Top rated building contractors in Worcester
I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?cited by domain
Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews13
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • tidiness4
  • quality of work4
  • communication4
  • plastering3
  • reliability3
  • excellent finish2
  • competitive pricing2
  • extension2
  • workmanship2
  • the future2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust40about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 1,268 words
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 20 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence8713 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (4 vs 32); Content & trust (40 vs 58); Technical (88 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest W Maggs Construction in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Court Property Developers#362/1002 places above you
Preece and Sons Ltd#758/1002 places below you
Speller Metcalfe Ltd#263/1003 places above you
WP Rendering#857/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 67 · accessibility 92 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Does not use HTTPS; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.; Legacy JavaScript
Google profile detail40 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed · 0 of 13 reviews are one star
Backlinks43 referring domains · 218 links · rank 135
Site structure1 pages crawled · 52 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 10% of links use a generic anchor

W Maggs Construction’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.