Skip to content

Court Property Developers — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 62 / 100 · Rank 3 of 55

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8161+20
Technical8875+13
Local presence9176+15
Visibility210+21
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7037+33
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+20
Technical+13
Local presence+15
Visibility+21
AI search presence0
Content & trust+33
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Ranks for 5 of 12 keywords, average position 32.2, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Worcesternot in top 100
construction companies Worcester#23
best builders Worcesternot in top 100
house extensions Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversions Worcesternot in top 100
new build developers Worcester#29
commercial construction Worcester#14
groundworks contractors Worcesternot in top 100
renovation builders Worcester#51
builders St John'snot in top 100
builders Barbourne#44
construction St John'snot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV81
Technical88
Local presence91
Visibility21
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Court Property Developers trails General Builds by 43 points across 3 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Local presence, Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
commercial construction Worcester#14

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Worcester?
Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Worcester
I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.8 / 5
Reviews22
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days3
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • project5
  • house building4
  • new build4
  • buyer3
  • quality homes2
  • snag resolution2
  • refurbished2
  • heat source pump2
  • attention to detail2
  • team2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 296 words
Visibility21ranks for 5 of 12 keywords · average position 32.2 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence9122 reviews · rated 4.8 · 3 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 20); Technical (88 vs 100); Visibility (21 vs 32).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Court Property Developers in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
General Builds#166/1002 places above you
W Maggs Construction#559/1002 places below you
James Grove Ltd-Worcester Tree Surgeons & Firewood Deliveries#658/1003 places below you
Preece and Sons Ltd#758/1004 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 03452103 · 28.9 years old · active · SIC 41100, 41202, 62012, 62020
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 83 · accessibility 96 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail16 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 1 of 22 reviews are one star
Backlinks61 referring domains · 94 links · rank 98 · 2 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 46 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor

Court Property Developers’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.