Digital Visibility Score: 66 / 100 · Rank 1 of 55
Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV +9 Technical +25 Local presence +14 Visibility +32 AI search presence +20 Content & trust +21
Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 38.7, in the local 3-pack for 4 keywords.
Keyword Position builders Worcester #4 construction companies Worcester #46 best builders Worcester #21 house extensions Worcester not in top 100 loft conversions Worcester not in top 100 new build developers Worcester not in top 100 commercial construction Worcester #66 groundworks contractors Worcester not in top 100 renovation builders Worcester #8 builders St John's not in top 100 builders Barbourne #87 construction St John's not in top 100
Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best builders in Worcester? ✗ Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension? ✗ Top rated building contractors in Worcester ✓ I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact? cited by domain ✗ Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating 4.8 / 5 Reviews 17 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 0 Address matches website yes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
reasonable rates 4 punctuality 4 patio construction 3 tidiness 3 polite staff 3 new guttering 2 window replacement 2 cellar work 2 brickwork 2 windows 2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 58 about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 537 words · last changed: 246 days ago Visibility 32 ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 38.7 · local 3-pack: 4 Local presence 90 17 reviews · rated 4.8 · 0 new in 90 days Technical 100 HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest General Builds in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 80 · accessibility 89 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript; Render-blocking requests; Network dependency tree Google profile detail 13 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 1 of 17 reviews are one star Backlinks 30 referring domains · 37 links · rank 17 Site structure 1 pages crawled · 53 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 2% of links use a generic anchor
General Builds’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .