Digital Visibility Score: 57 / 100 · Rank 8 of 55
Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV -1 Technical +25 Local presence +21 Visibility 0 AI search presence 0 Content & trust +16
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth knowing The site has not changed in a long time The homepage last reported a change 4.5 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position builders Worcester not in top 100 construction companies Worcester not in top 100 best builders Worcester not in top 100 house extensions Worcester not in top 100 loft conversions Worcester not in top 100 new build developers Worcester not in top 100 commercial construction Worcester not in top 100 groundworks contractors Worcester not in top 100 renovation builders Worcester not in top 100 builders St John's not in top 100 builders Barbourne not in top 100 construction St John's not in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV 60 Technical 100 Local presence 97 Visibility 0 AI search presence 0 Content & trust 53
this firm sector median leader
WP Rendering trails General Builds by 67 points across 4 pillars, but 78% of that is Visibility and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence.
Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best builders in Worcester? ✗ Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension? ✗ Top rated building contractors in Worcester ✗ I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact? ✗ Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Google Business Profile.
Rating 4.8 / 5 Reviews 64 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 2 Address matches website yes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
hard working team 9 external insulation 8 polite team 8 house rendering 6 friendly trades 3 reduced heating costs 2 professional quote 2 lovely finish 2 informative staff 2 property transformation 2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 53 about page: no · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,825 words · last changed: 1628 days ago Visibility 0 ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 97 64 reviews · rated 4.8 · 2 new in 90 days Technical 100 HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.
General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 32); AI search presence (0 vs 20); Speed & CWV (60 vs 70).
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest WP Rendering in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 56 · accessibility 86 · best practices 81 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Legacy JavaScript; Use efficient cache lifetimes Google profile detail 638 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 2 of 64 reviews are one star Backlinks 55 referring domains · 126 links · rank 124 Site structure 1 pages crawled · 73 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 8% of links use a generic anchor
WP Rendering’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .