Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6.1 years ago.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 45 · accessibility 78 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links do not have a discernible name; Document does not have a main landmark.; First Contentful Paint
Google profile detail
70 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 20 reviews are one star
Backlinks
22 referring domains · 23 links · rank 0
Site structure
13 pages crawled · 62.7 internal links per page · 1% of links use a generic anchor
S J Gill Property Maintenance’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.