Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 208 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.2 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
100
Technical
50
Local presence
76
Visibility
13
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
12
this firm sector median leader
J Pack General Builder trails General Builds by 149 points across 5 pillars, but 64% of that is Technical and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 99 · accessibility 72 · best practices 70 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Does not use HTTPS; Page lacks the HTML doctype, thus triggering quirks-mode; Avoid multiple page redirects
Google profile detail
2 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Content & trust (12/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing this pillar: content & trust.