Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
68
Technical
75
Local presence
63
Visibility
4
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
60
this firm sector median leader
Miller Homes West Midlands trails General Builds by 102 points across 5 pillars, but 54% of that is Visibility and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
11.8s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
2.0s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 5.9× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.
Performance 44 · accessibility 96 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Reduce unused JavaScript; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Visibility (4/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.