Skip to content

Miller Homes West Midlands — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 48 / 100 · Rank 29 of 55

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6861+7
Technical7575level
Local presence6376−13
Visibility40+4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust6037+23
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+7
Technical0
Local presence-13
Visibility+4
AI search presence0
Content & trust+23
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 12, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Worcesternot in top 100
construction companies Worcesternot in top 100
best builders Worcesternot in top 100
house extensions Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversions Worcesternot in top 100
new build developers Worcester#12
commercial construction Worcesternot in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcesternot in top 100
renovation builders Worcesternot in top 100
builders St John'snot in top 100
builders Barbournenot in top 100
construction St John'snot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV68
Technical75
Local presence63
Visibility4
AI search presence0
Content & trust60

this firm sector median leader

Miller Homes West Midlands trails General Builds by 102 points across 5 pillars, but 54% of that is Visibility and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
new build developers Worcester#12

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Worcester?
Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Worcester
I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)11.8sone throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)2.0s75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days

The lab figure is 5.9× the real-user figure. The lab test rates this site poorly, but real visitors are not experiencing it that way — Core Web Vitals pass on field data. Treat a low lab score here as a lead to investigate, not a fault to pay to fix.

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust60about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,563 words
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 12 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence630 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 76.

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (4 vs 32); Local presence (63 vs 90); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Miller Homes West Midlands in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
J Pack General Builder#2748/1002 places above you
Titan Construction and Building Services LTD#3148/1002 places below you
Hemming Carpentry and Construction Services Ltd#2648/1003 places above you
Owen Developments (Worcester) Ltd#3247/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)LCP 1990ms · INP 190ms · CLS 0.01 · passes Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 44 · accessibility 96 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Reduce unused JavaScript; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Google profile detail1 photo · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks1270 referring domains · 24358 links · rank 337 · 5270 broken
Site structure25 pages crawled · 113.4 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 2 clicks · 0% of links use a generic anchor

Miller Homes West Midlands’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.