Skip to content

SG Building Services — Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 47 / 100 · Rank 33 of 55

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5761−4
Technical10075+25
Local presence6776−9
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2537−12
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-4
Technical+25
Local presence-9
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-12
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 187 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Worcesternot in top 100
construction companies Worcesternot in top 100
best builders Worcesternot in top 100
house extensions Worcesternot in top 100
loft conversions Worcesternot in top 100
new build developers Worcesternot in top 100
commercial construction Worcesternot in top 100
groundworks contractors Worcesternot in top 100
renovation builders Worcesternot in top 100
builders St John'snot in top 100
builders Barbournenot in top 100
construction St John'snot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV57
Technical100
Local presence67
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust25

this firm sector median leader

SG Building Services trails General Builds by 121 points across 5 pillars, but 54% of that is Content & trust and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Worcester?
Which construction company in Worcester would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Worcester
I need a builder in Worcester - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in St John's, Worcester
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust25about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 187 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 25/100, below the sector median of 37.

General Builds leads the index with 66/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (25 vs 58); Visibility (0 vs 32); Local presence (67 vs 90).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest SG Building Services in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Titan Construction and Building Services LTD#3148/1002 places above you
Kepax construction site#3546/1002 places below you
S J Gill Property Maintenance#3048/1003 places above you
Cottrill’s carpentry LTD#3645/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 55 · accessibility 98 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Document request latency; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail1 photo · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks40 referring domains · 40 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 23 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 4% of links use a generic anchor · 6 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap6 URLs listed

SG Building Services’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.