Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Worcester Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, General Builds, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
50
Technical
63
Local presence
76
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
80
this firm sector median leader
Kepax construction site trails General Builds by 123 points across 5 pillars, but 56% of that is Technical and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 41 · accessibility 84 · best practices 73 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Browser errors were logged to the console; Render-blocking requests; Font display
Google profile detail
5 photos · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks
273 referring domains · 1210 links · rank 212
Site structure
25 pages crawled · 33.9 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 2 clicks, services 2 clicks · 4% of links use a generic anchor
Kepax construction site’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.