Skip to content

Sullivan — Swindon Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 58 / 100 · Rank 9 of 29

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Swindon Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5566−11
Technical7575level
Local presence6877−9
Visibility407+33
AI search presence600+60
Content & trust3530+5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-11
Technical0
Local presence-9
Visibility+33
AI search presence+60
Content & trust+5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 9 of 12 keywords, average position 10.8, in the local 3-pack for 1 keyword.
KeywordPosition
architects Swindon#2
architect Swindon#3
architectural services Swindon#7
house extension architect Swindonnot in top 100
planning application architect Swindon#10
listed building architect Swindon#34
residential architects Swindon#3
commercial architects Swindon#3
self build architect Swindon#18
loft conversion architect Swindonnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Swindonnot in top 100
conservation architect Swindon#17
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Oc Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV55
Technical75
Local presence68
Visibility40
AI search presence60
Content & trust35

this firm sector median leader

Sullivan trails Oc Architects by 101 points across 6 pillars, but 51% of that is Visibility and AI search presence alone.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
conservation architect Swindon#17
self build architect Swindon#18

2 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 3 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Swindon?cited by domain
Which architect in Swindon would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Swindoncited by domain
I need an architect in Swindon - who should I contact?cited by domain
Conservation architects in Swindon
Google Business Profile.
Rating4 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust35about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 515 words
Visibility40ranks for 9 of 12 keywords · average position 10.8 · local 3-pack: 1
Local presence681 reviews · rated 4 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Speed & CWV: 55/100, below the sector median of 66.

Oc Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (40 vs 72); AI search presence (60 vs 80); Content & trust (35 vs 49).

  1. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Sullivan in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Allan Corfield Architects Ltd#758/1002 places above you
Rand Planning Consultancy#1156/1002 places below you
Home Plan Design Services#659/1003 places above you
MJF CAD Solutions Ltd.#1255/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 51 · accessibility 89 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Minify JavaScript; Largest Contentful Paint; Font display
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks33 referring domains · 53 links · rank 0
Site structure11 pages crawled · 19.9 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap3 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates · 3 of 3 sampled URLs resolve

Sullivan’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.