Skip to content

Planning Drawings — Swindon Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 53 / 100 · Rank 13 of 29

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Swindon Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV9966+33
Technical8875+13
Local presence7777level
Visibility07−7
AI search presence00level
Content & trust530−25
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+33
Technical+13
Local presence0
Visibility-7
AI search presence0
Content & trust-25
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 99 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Swindonnot in top 100
architect Swindonnot in top 100
architectural services Swindonnot in top 100
house extension architect Swindonnot in top 100
planning application architect Swindonnot in top 100
listed building architect Swindonnot in top 100
residential architects Swindonnot in top 100
commercial architects Swindonnot in top 100
self build architect Swindonnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Swindonnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Swindonnot in top 100
conservation architect Swindonnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Oc Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV99
Technical88
Local presence77
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust5

this firm sector median leader

Planning Drawings trails Oc Architects by 196 points across 3 pillars, but 78% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical, Local presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Swindon?
Which architect in Swindon would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Swindon
I need an architect in Swindon - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Swindon
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews3
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust5about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 99 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence773 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 5/100, below the sector median of 30.

Oc Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Visibility (0 vs 72); Content & trust (5 vs 49).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Planning Drawings in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Rand Planning Consultancy#1156/1002 places above you
Construction Edge Swindon Ltd#1549/1002 places below you
DPDS Consulting Group#1056/1003 places above you
Squires Planning#1648/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 99 · accessibility 97 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks41 referring domains · 44 links · rank 0
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 403

Planning Drawings’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.