Skip to content

Brothertons — Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 56 / 100 · Rank 17 of 41

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7365.5+7.5
Technical8875+13
Local presence7879−1
Visibility1713+4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust5354−1
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+7.5
Technical+13
Local presence-1
Visibility+4
AI search presence0
Content & trust-1
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 10.5 years ago.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 40.3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
accountants Gloucester#29
chartered accountants Gloucester#41
best accountants Gloucester#50
small business accountant Gloucesternot in top 100
tax advisor Gloucesternot in top 100
bookkeeping Gloucesternot in top 100
self assessment help Gloucesternot in top 100
company accounts Gloucesternot in top 100
payroll services Gloucesternot in top 100
accountants Quedgeleynot in top 100
accountants Hucclecote#41
bookkeeping Quedgeleynot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical88
Local presence78
Visibility17
AI search presence0
Content & trust53

this firm sector median leader

Brothertons trails Griffiths Marshall by 140 points across 3 pillars, but 76% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best accountants in Gloucester?
Which accountant in Gloucester would you recommend for a small business?
Top rated chartered accountants in Gloucester
I need an accountant in Gloucester - who should I contact?
Best accountants in Quedgeley, Gloucester
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews4
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust53about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,294 words · last changed: 3838 days ago
Visibility17ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 40.3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence784 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Griffiths Marshall leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (53 vs 100); Visibility (17 vs 50).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Brothertons in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
PBT Accountancy Limited#1559/1002 places above you
Abaqus#1955/1002 places below you
LNH Management Solutions Limited#1459/1003 places above you
Gloucester Cloud Accountants#2053/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 76 · accessibility 67 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Form elements do not have associated labels; Buttons do not have an accessible name; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks70 referring domains · 128 links · rank 68 · 60 broken
Site structure7 pages crawled · 23.9 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor

Brothertons’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.