Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 10.5 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical
88
Local presence
78
Visibility
17
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
53
this firm sector median leader
Brothertons trails Griffiths Marshall by 140 points across 3 pillars, but 76% of that is AI search presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Local presence.
Griffiths Marshall leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (53 vs 100); Visibility (17 vs 50).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 76 · accessibility 67 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Form elements do not have associated labels; Buttons do not have an accessible name; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Visibility (17/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.