Skip to content

NPS Property Consultants — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 60 / 100 · Rank 14 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7664+12
Technical10088+12
Local presence7876+2
Visibility04−4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust8749.5+37.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+12
Technical+12
Local presence+2
Visibility-4
AI search presence0
Content & trust+37.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 10.5 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeternot in top 100
architect Exeternot in top 100
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeternot in top 100
commercial architects Exeternot in top 100
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV76
Technical100
Local presence78
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust87

this firm sector median leader

NPS Property Consultants trails Living Space Architects by 166 points across 4 pillars, but 92% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews4
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust87about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,127 words · last changed: 3849 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence784 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); Local presence (78 vs 88).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest NPS Property Consultants in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
KTA - Architects in Exeter and Plymouth, Devon#1260/1002 places above you
GJR Architects Ltd#1659/1002 places below you
Gray + Gray architects#1160/1003 places above you
PMR Architecture#1759/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 61 · accessibility 92 · best practices 77 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Document request latency; Largest Contentful Paint; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail1 photo · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks331 referring domains · 6512 links · rank 292 · 4432 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 0 internal links per page
Sitemapdeclared in robots.txt

NPS Property Consultants’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.