Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 12.2 years ago.
Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 100); Visibility (34 vs 53); Speed & CWV (64 vs 79).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 63 · accessibility 81 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.; Avoid multiple page redirects
Google profile detail
2 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
64 referring domains · 74 links · rank 70
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 13 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Visibility (34/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.