Skip to content

GJR Architects Ltd — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 59 / 100 · Rank 16 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6464level
Technical8888level
Local presence8176+5
Visibility344+30
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust4149.5−8.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV0
Technical0
Local presence+5
Visibility+30
AI search presence+20
Content & trust-8.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 12.2 years ago.
Ranks for 7 of 12 keywords, average position 9.3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeter#9
architect Exeter#9
architectural services Exeter#5
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeter#24
residential architects Exeter#8
commercial architects Exeter#4
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeter#6
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV64
Technical88
Local presence81
Visibility34
AI search presence20
Content & trust41

this firm sector median leader

GJR Architects Ltd trails Living Space Architects by 145 points across 6 pillars, but 68% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exetercited by domain
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.7 / 5
Reviews3
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust41about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 133 words · last changed: 4465 days ago
Visibility34ranks for 7 of 12 keywords · average position 9.3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence813 reviews · rated 4.7 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 100); Visibility (34 vs 53); Speed & CWV (64 vs 79).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest GJR Architects Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
NPS Property Consultants#1460/1002 places above you
Salmon Planning Company - West Somerset, Devon & Cornwall#1859/1002 places below you
LHC Design#1360/1003 places above you
Maria Escribano Architects Ltd#1957/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 63 · accessibility 81 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.; Avoid multiple page redirects
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks64 referring domains · 74 links · rank 70
Site structure1 pages crawled · 13 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

GJR Architects Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.