Skip to content

PMR Architecture — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 59 / 100 · Rank 17 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6464level
Technical10088+12
Local presence6376−13
Visibility434+39
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust3749.5−12.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV0
Technical+12
Local presence-13
Visibility+39
AI search presence+20
Content & trust-12.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.1 years ago.
Ranks for 9 of 12 keywords, average position 9.2, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeter#10
architect Exeter#11
architectural services Exeter#4
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeter#35
listed building architect Exeter#5
residential architects Exeter#6
commercial architects Exeter#1
self build architect Exeter#2
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeter#9
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV64
Technical100
Local presence63
Visibility43
AI search presence20
Content & trust37

this firm sector median leader

PMR Architecture trails Living Space Architects by 146 points across 5 pillars, but 72% of that is AI search presence and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
architect Exeter#11

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exetercited by domain
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust37about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 2,056 words · last changed: 1856 days ago
Visibility43ranks for 9 of 12 keywords · average position 9.2 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence630 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 76.
  • Content & trust: 37/100, below the sector median of 49.5.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 100); Local presence (63 vs 88); Content & trust (37 vs 53).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
The firms nearest PMR Architecture in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Stephen Varney Associates Architects - Exeter#1560/1002 places above you
Maria Escribano Architects Ltd#1957/1002 places below you
NPS Property Consultants#1460/1003 places above you
Acorus Rural Property Services Ltd#2056/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 68 · accessibility 98 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Does not use HTTPS; Browser errors were logged to the console; Render-blocking requests
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks74 referring domains · 372 links · rank 148
Site structure1 pages crawled · 30 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 42 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap43 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 89 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

PMR Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.