Skip to content

Gray + Gray architects — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 60 / 100 · Rank 11 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5964−5
Technical8888level
Local presence7676level
Visibility254+21
AI search presence400+40
Content & trust5849.5+8.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-5
Technical0
Local presence0
Visibility+21
AI search presence+40
Content & trust+8.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 9.7 years ago.
Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 34.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeter#38
architect Exeter#30
architectural services Exeter#36
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeter#21
commercial architects Exeter#71
self build architect Exeter#11
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV59
Technical88
Local presence76
Visibility25
AI search presence40
Content & trust58

this firm sector median leader

Gray + Gray architects trails Living Space Architects by 132 points across 5 pillars, but 67% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
self build architect Exeter#11

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?cited by domain
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust58about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 173 words · last changed: 3540 days ago
Visibility25ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 34.5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence761 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (40 vs 100); Visibility (25 vs 53); Speed & CWV (59 vs 79).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Gray + Gray architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
ET Architect#961/1002 places above you
LHC Design#1360/1002 places below you
MJM Architecture#867/1003 places above you
NPS Property Consultants#1460/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 60 · accessibility 71 · best practices 78 · SEO 77 — biggest losses: Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools; Avoid multiple page redirects; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail17 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks64 referring domains · 79 links · rank 49
Site structure1 pages crawled · 23 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 7 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap7 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 3248 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Gray + Gray architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.