Skip to content

ET Architect — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 61 / 100 · Rank 9 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8564+21
Technical10088+12
Local presence8176+5
Visibility254+21
AI search presence00level
Content & trust4549.5−4.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+21
Technical+12
Local presence+5
Visibility+21
AI search presence0
Content & trust-4.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 2.4 years ago.
Ranks for 6 of 12 keywords, average position 35.7, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeter#31
architect Exeter#24
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeter#68
residential architects Exeter#24
commercial architects Exeter#48
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeter#19
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV85
Technical100
Local presence81
Visibility25
AI search presence0
Content & trust45

this firm sector median leader

ET Architect trails Living Space Architects by 143 points across 4 pillars, but 90% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Technical.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
loft conversion architect Exeter#19

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust45about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 310 words · last changed: 862 days ago
Visibility25ranks for 6 of 12 keywords · average position 35.7 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence812 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (25 vs 53).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest ET Architect in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Barc Architects#767/1002 places above you
Gray + Gray architects#1160/1002 places below you
ARP Architects Ltd.#668/1003 places above you
KTA - Architects in Exeter and Plymouth, Devon#1260/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 90 · accessibility 100 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Font display; Render-blocking requests; Use efficient cache lifetimes
Google profile detail4 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks41 referring domains · 43 links · rank 0
Site structure15 pages crawled · 13.9 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 1% of links use a generic anchor · 0 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap4 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 252 days old · 4 of 4 sampled URLs resolve

ET Architect’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.